LEGISREPORTS NG – The suspension of the Minority Leader of the
Katsina State House of Assembly, Alhaji Abdullahi Ibrahim Mahuta, for
accusing the executive arm of government for poor performance in budget
implementation has sparked off heated reactions resulting in a war of
words between the Congress for Progressive Change, CPC, and the House
Leadership in Katsina State.
Mahuta, who represents Malumfashi state constituency was quoted as
saying that the average performance of the Katsina State Government on
budget implementation stands at about 36 percent for 2011 and 37 percent
for 2012.
He also slammed the Assembly for failing to live up to its
constitutional duty of oversight, one that he stated would have
otherwise improved on the performance level of the 2012 budget.
This irked the lawmakers who immediately reconvened midway from a
recess period embarked upon for a special sitting to deliberate on the
matter.
The House sat on June 3, 20113 and suspended Mahuta from his position
as minority leader pending the outcome of investigations by the House
committee on ethics and privileges.
The decision to suspend the minority leader of the House however did
not go down well with CPC in the state, as the Party’s interim chairman,
Alhaji Farouq Adamu Aliyu, faulted the decision, saying proper
procedures were not followed by the lawmakers.
Aliyu described the suspension as illegal and unconstitutional,
saying “there is no way you can move a motion, refer the matter to the
ethics and privileges committee and at the same time arrive at a
conclusion to suspend an accused member without giving him a chance to
defend himself before the committee.”
He said the suspension of the lawmaker has indicated that the House lacks capacity to perform its duty professionally.
On his path, Speaker of the House, Alhaji Ya’u Umar Gwajo-Gwajo, on
the contrary defended the procedure adopted by the House to suspend the
lawmaker saying, “every House has its own rules and traditions.”
According to him, “there is no way you can investigate him while
holding his position because there is every tendency of tampering with
the investigation through the influence of his position. So the
lawmakers unanimously agreed that he should be suspended and we
suspended him pending the completion of the investigation.”
The Speaker further said that if Mahuta is found to be innocent, his
suspension will be lifted, but if found otherwise, the House will look
at the recommendations of the committee and decide on the type of
punishment that should be applied on the lawmaker.
0 comments:
Post a Comment